Conventionally, medical malpractice is argued using inductive reasoning. There is nothing wrong with inductive reasoning. It is a component of critical thinking. However, it is just a component. Inductive reasoning is more subjective than objective and the influences of selection bias, avoidance bias, and confirmation bias are undetectable. Deductive reasoning is also a component of
Read more…
Deductive reasoning in medical malpractice: a quantitative approach originally appeared in KevinMD.com.
StockWatch: C-Suite Shakeup, Phase III Plans Jolt Cardiff Investors
Cardiff Oncology (NASDAQ: CRDF) this past week trumpeted positive data via press release from a Phase II trial of its lead pipeline candidate, onvansertib, in
